EPCSOFTWARES
Search/

Versus

Contruent Enterprise vs Oracle Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 034

Contruent Enterprise

Contruent · Planning, Scheduling & Risk

02040608010073EPC INDEX

The former ARES PRISM remains a heavyweight cost and controls platform for large capital programmes.

FIG. 067

Oracle Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management

Oracle · Planning, Scheduling & Risk

02040608010083EPC INDEX

Still the contractual standard for EPC scheduling. Few projects can avoid it; the question is how well you run it, not whether.

  1. 8Capability25%9
  2. 7Interoperability20%8
  3. 9Scale15%10
  4. 6Usability15%5
  5. 7Deployment10%7
  6. 6Ecosystem15%10
AttributeContruent EnterpriseOracle Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management
VendorContruentOracle
CategoryPlanning, Scheduling & RiskPlanning, Scheduling & Risk
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentSaaSOn-premises · SaaS
Licensingn/an/a
Standardsn/aXER/XML schedule exchange
Strengths
  • Integrated cost and schedule control
  • Change and forecast management
  • APIs and connectors
  • De facto contract standard
  • Handles very large schedules
  • Huge planner workforce
Considerations
  • Rename from ARES PRISM
  • Configuration effort
  • Smaller user community
  • Steep learning curve
  • Oracle steers new investment to Primavera Cloud
  • Interface shows its age

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.