EPCSOFTWARES
Search/

Versus

Octave OnSite Completions vs Procore

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 062

Octave OnSite Completions

Octave · Construction & Completions

02040608010073EPC INDEX

A dedicated completions system for industrial projects, covering the turnover discipline general construction platforms leave thin.

FIG. 069

Procore

Procore Technologies · Construction & Completions

02040608010083EPC INDEX

The most widely adopted construction management platform, valued for usability and its ecosystem. Process-plant completions still need specialist tools.

  1. 8Capability25%8
  2. 7Interoperability20%8
  3. 8Scale15%8
  4. 7Usability15%9
  5. 7Deployment10%8
  6. 6Ecosystem15%9
AttributeOctave OnSite CompletionsProcore
VendorOctaveProcore Technologies
CategoryConstruction & CompletionsConstruction & Completions
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentMobileSaaS · Mobile
Licensingn/an/a
Standardsn/an/a
Strengths
  • Systems-based completions
  • Digital check sheets
  • P6 and ERP APIs
  • Ease of adoption
  • App marketplace
  • Field mobility
Considerations
  • Specialist scope
  • Rebrand from Smart Completions
  • Smaller user community
  • Not specialised in process-plant completions
  • Commercial model scales with volume
  • Integration with plant engineering data is limited

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.