Versus

Oracle Aconex vs Procore

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 065

Oracle Aconex

Oracle · Document Control & CDE

02040608010084EPC INDEX

The neutral, owner-trusted CDE for mega-projects, where each party keeps ownership of its data. A safe default when many organisations must share one record.

FIG. 069

Procore

Procore Technologies · Construction & Completions

02040608010083EPC INDEX

The most widely adopted construction management platform, valued for usability and its ecosystem. Process-plant completions still need specialist tools.

  1. 9Capability25%8
  2. 7Interoperability20%8
  3. 10Scale15%8
  4. 7Usability15%9
  5. 8Deployment10%8
  6. 9Ecosystem15%9
AttributeOracle AconexProcore
VendorOracleProcore Technologies
CategoryDocument Control & CDEConstruction & Completions
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentSaaS · MobileSaaS · Mobile
Licensingn/an/a
Standardsn/an/a
Strengths
  • Unalterable audit trail
  • Scales to hundreds of organisations
  • Widely mandated by owners
  • Ease of adoption
  • App marketplace
  • Field mobility
Considerations
  • Engineering work-in-progress usually lives elsewhere
  • Workflow configuration needs governance
  • Per-project commercial model
  • Not specialised in process-plant completions
  • Commercial model scales with volume
  • Integration with plant engineering data is limited

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.