Versus

Procore vs Forma Build

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 069

Procore

Procore Technologies · Construction & Completions

02040608010083EPC INDEX

The most widely adopted construction management platform, valued for usability and its ecosystem. Process-plant completions still need specialist tools.

FIG. 007

Forma Build

Autodesk · Construction & Completions

02040608010078EPC INDEX

Autodesk's field and project management product, strongest where design already lives in Autodesk tools.

  1. 8Capability25%8
  2. 8Interoperability20%7
  3. 8Scale15%8
  4. 9Usability15%8
  5. 8Deployment10%8
  6. 9Ecosystem15%8
AttributeProcoreForma Build
VendorProcore TechnologiesAutodesk
CategoryConstruction & CompletionsConstruction & Completions
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentSaaS · MobileSaaS · Mobile
Licensingn/an/a
Standardsn/an/a
Strengths
  • Ease of adoption
  • App marketplace
  • Field mobility
  • Tight model and document links
  • Field mobility
  • Cost management
Considerations
  • Not specialised in process-plant completions
  • Commercial model scales with volume
  • Integration with plant engineering data is limited
  • Rename to the Forma brand
  • Process-plant completions need other tools
  • Autodesk-centred

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.