Versus

ProMax vs Aspen HYSYS

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 070

ProMax

Bryan Research & Engineering · Process Simulation

02040608010068EPC INDEX

The specialist's choice for gas treating and sulfur recovery, often run alongside a general-purpose simulator.

FIG. 003

Aspen HYSYS

AspenTech · Process Simulation

02040608010084EPC INDEX

The benchmark simulator for oil and gas and refining. Its depth and the size of its user community make it the safe default for EPC process teams in hydrocarbons.

  1. 8Capability25%10
  2. 6Interoperability20%7
  3. 7Scale15%9
  4. 7Usability15%7
  5. 6Deployment10%6
  6. 6Ecosystem15%10
AttributeProMaxAspen HYSYS
VendorBryan Research & EngineeringAspenTech
CategoryProcess SimulationProcess Simulation
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentDesktopDesktop
LicensingCommercial licenceCommercial licence
Standardsn/an/a
Strengths
  • Gas treating and sulfur recovery depth
  • Historian data exchange
  • Pipeline network solver
  • Steady-state and dynamics in one tool
  • Relief and safety study coverage
  • Largest pool of trained engineers
Considerations
  • Narrower scope than general simulators
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Desktop-centred
  • Premium licensing
  • Chemicals-heavy work may suit Aspen Plus better
  • Cloud deployment is not its strong suit

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.