Versus

AVEVA PRO/II Simulation vs Aspen HYSYS

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 017

AVEVA PRO/II Simulation

AVEVA · Process Simulation

02040608010070EPC INDEX

A proven steady-state workhorse for refining, now positioned as the predecessor to AVEVA Process Simulation. Good for existing models; plan the long-term path.

FIG. 003

Aspen HYSYS

AspenTech · Process Simulation

02040608010084EPC INDEX

The benchmark simulator for oil and gas and refining. Its depth and the size of its user community make it the safe default for EPC process teams in hydrocarbons.

  1. 8Capability25%10
  2. 6Interoperability20%7
  3. 8Scale15%9
  4. 6Usability15%7
  5. 6Deployment10%6
  6. 7Ecosystem15%10
AttributeAVEVA PRO/II SimulationAspen HYSYS
VendorAVEVAAspenTech
CategoryProcess SimulationProcess Simulation
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentCloud · On-premisesDesktop
LicensingCommercial licenceCommercial licence
Standardsn/an/a
Strengths
  • Refinery reactor models
  • Long track record
  • HTRI and OLI integrations
  • Steady-state and dynamics in one tool
  • Relief and safety study coverage
  • Largest pool of trained engineers
Considerations
  • Successor product is AVEVA's strategic focus
  • Steady-state only
  • Older interface
  • Premium licensing
  • Chemicals-heavy work may suit Aspen Plus better
  • Cloud deployment is not its strong suit

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.