EPCSOFTWARES
Search/

Versus

Octave Forte 3D vs AVEVA E3D Design

Put any two products side by side: specification, the six criteria and the EPC Index needle.

FIG. 058

Octave Forte 3D

Octave · 3D Plant Design

02040608010081EPC INDEX

Intergraph Smart 3D under a new name, and still one of the two benchmark plant design systems for large EPC work. Choose it where the owner or the rest of the toolchain is Octave/Intergraph-based.

FIG. 012

AVEVA E3D Design

AVEVA · 3D Plant Design

02040608010082EPC INDEX

The reference choice for large multidiscipline plant and offshore projects, especially where the owner already runs AVEVA. Its strength is scale and maturity rather than ease of entry.

  1. 9Capability25%9
  2. 7Interoperability20%7
  3. 10Scale15%10
  4. 6Usability15%6
  5. 7Deployment10%8
  6. 9Ecosystem15%9
AttributeOctave Forte 3DAVEVA E3D Design
VendorOctaveAVEVA
Category3D Plant Design3D Plant Design
StatusActiveActive
DeploymentDesktopDesktop · Cloud
LicensingCommercial licenceSubscription
Standardsn/an/a
Strengths
  • Rule-driven design that catches errors early
  • Mature global work-share
  • Integrated with Facets P&ID and Aspect Pipe Stress
  • Proven on very large, multi-site projects
  • Tight integration with AVEVA schematics, E&I and engineering data
  • Large global talent and partner pool
Considerations
  • Rebrand to Octave adds a period of name and packaging change
  • Significant reference-data and administration effort
  • Smaller teams may find it heavier than needed
  • Steep learning curve and catalogue administration effort
  • Most value is realised inside the AVEVA ecosystem
  • Subscription credits need active management

§ 02

Popular match-ups

The two leading products in each category, ready to compare.